Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Inserts can be as fast as downloads

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: NextGen$
Date:  
To: Discussion of development issues
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Inserts can be as fast as downloads
* Thomas Bruderer <bruthoma@???> [2006-04-19 14:59:02]:

>
> > And what's the reason of the backoff ? :) isn't it a high network latency ? >
> > try pinging a backed off peer.
>
> Good idea I did that... now look at the result:
> Low Level PING, i.e. ICMP
>
> None means they dont respond to ICMP Packets... I love those.
>
> CONNECTED 120.371    Fred,0.7,1.0,633
> CONNECTED 196.982    Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> CONNECTED 115.929    Fred,0.7,1.0,647
> CONNECTED NONE    Fred,0.7,1.0,625
> CONNECTED 101.057     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> CONNECTED NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,647
> CONNECTED 153.666     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> CONNECTED NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> CONNECTED NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,625
> BACKED OFF NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF 51.486     Fred,0.7,1.0,647
> BACKED OFF 561.061     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF 131.108     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF 1143.935     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,647
> BACKED OFF 65.244     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF 126.501     Fred,0.7,1.0,648
> BACKED OFF NONE     Fred,0.7,1.0,622
> BACKED OFF 57.296     Fred,0.7,1.0,647
>
> I tried it 3 times (real time) and the results where similar all the time also
> the low pinger were backed off for quite long time intervals.


Assuming your measures are accurate :

10 BACKED OFF peers, 2 where data is unaviable => 8 remaining

2 of them have a "low level" ping >500ms <= the backoff is justified for sure
=> 6 remaining

Then, please increase the loglevel (set it to MINOR) and see how big is the
high level ping. Give us some details on your physical connection (the
bandwidth the ISP advertizes), and your bandwidth limit in freenet.ini plus
the total number of peers.

NextGen$