Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 06:30:28PM +0100, Volodya wrote:
>
>>Thanks a lot, that was a very useful explanation... q;-) So basically what
>>i'll do is make sure that i first connect to people that i *really* trust,
>>that will ensure that even after the connection to the first one but before
>>i find the second one i won't be paranoid. After that i might start going
>>around looking for people to connect to that i trust reasonably, but not as
>>much.
>
>
> Reasonable, although you are always vulnerable to your direct peers. If
> you are paranoid, you should only connect to people you trust. Of course
> you could run a second node for the less-trustworthy people. :)
But if i have total of 50+ nodes that i've connected to, i am as vulnerable as in the
current 0,5; however, at least i have chosen them to be "partially" reliable... or have i
misunderstood something.
Also the thing is that i'm paranoid without any reason most of the time... q;-) I do like
an idea about the second node, i'll have to think about it.
- Volodya
--
Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread!
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://www.whengendarmesleeps.org/ When Gendarme Sleeps, Anarchy's Zine of Poetry
========================
"None of us are free until all of us are free."
~ Mihail Bakunin
