* Matthew Toseland <toad@???> [2006-04-26 13:26:33]:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:23AM +0000, NextGen$ wrote:
> >
> > imho Up&p and stun are useless without multi-homming support.
>
> Huh? What exactly do you think is necessary prior to STUN/UP&P?
Having references with multiple contact points (an "official" signed
reference with possibly several addresses and an unofficial one with ip
gathered from up&p, other peers, last known, ...)... And maybe the
possibility within the node to have different listeners bound to different
sockets.
> >
> > Concerning STUN, in .5 we were using a dns root server to detect our external IP
> > . That's what STUN will provide, right?. See https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/branches/legacy/unstable/src/freenet/node/IPAddressDetector.java and oldDetect().
> >
> > And concerning UP&P ... you know my thought.
> >
> > NextGen$
> --
> Matthew J Toseland - toad@???
> Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
> ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech@???
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
