> Even if DADVSI is passed, the case of Freenet remains debatable. In fact,
> DADVSI says that it's forbidden to develop networks being explicitly designed
> for illegal file sharing. As you can guess, this is stupid: How judges will
> define if a network is designed for that or not ? It's even more true for
> Freenet, as the main goal is the freedom of speech, and clearly not illegal
> file sharing.
Thinking of it logically FileZilla client/server is more illegal then Freenet.
--
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki
"None of us are free until all of us are free."
~ Mihail Bakunin
