Matthew Toseland wrote:
(snip)
> We should also think about randomising locations less frequently. It can take
> a while to recover, and the current code randomizes roughly every 13 to 22
> hours. It may be useful to increase this significantly? Unfortunately this
> parameter is very dependant on the network size and so on, it's not really
> something we can get a good value for from simulations... I suggest we
> increase it by say a factor of 4, and if we get major location distribution
> issues, we can reduce it again.
In this regard, I've been tracking my location for some time, sampling each
hour. I can't really say if what I'm seeing is expected/sane. See attached.
