Re: [freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities

Top Page
Author: Matthew Toseland
Date:  
To: Discussion of development issues
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities
Delete this message
Reply to this message
gpg: Signature made Tue May 13 17:55:08 2008 UTC using DSA key ID E43DA450
gpg: Good signature from "Matthew John Toseland <toad@amphibian.dyndns.org>"
On Monday 12 May 2008 23:10, Michael Rogers wrote:
> Victor Denisov wrote:
> > Input Rate: 17.6 KiB/sec (of 300 KiB)
> > Output Rate: 15.9 KiB/sec (of 200 KiB)
> > Total Input: 4.83 GiB (28.3 KiB/sec)
> > Total Output: 5.66 GiB (33.2 KiB/sec)
> >
> > Used Java memory: 122 MiB
> > Allocated Java memory: 127 MiB
> > Maximum Java memory: 284 MiB
> > Running threads: 152/700
> >
> > So, basically, network had grown about 3x after 0.7 release. My node has
> > been up for 2 days, and is pretty well established in the network. It's
> > not overloaded (CPU usage is ~ 5-10%). Yet it doesn't use more than
> > about 15% of the allowed bandwidth, on average.
>
> If the average speed of a node is, say, 20 KB/s then your node's
> unlikely to be able to use 300 KB/s because its peers won't be
> sending/accepting enough traffic (due to their own bandwidth limits, not
> yours). This could be solved by allowing fast nodes to have more peers,
> but of course that creates the possibility of ubernodes.


It could also be solved to a degree by a different load management scheme that
allowed us more fine grained control over the degree to which ubernodes can
take more requests... But a) that's probably too big a job for 0.7.1, and b)
the current system seems to more or less work.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael