gpg: Signature made Wed May 14 09:23:49 2008 UTC using DSA key ID 715FC6D7
gpg: Good signature from "NextGen$ <nextgens@laposte.net>"
gpg: aka "NextGen$ <nextgens35@laposte.net>"
gpg: aka "Florent Daignière <florent.daigniere@laposte.net>"
* Jano <alejandro@???> [2008-05-14 11:21:05]:
> > Personally I'm pretty skeptical of anything requiring more than 100MB.
>
> However, current implementation (IINM) uses the cache to resume downloads.
> Thus, downloading anything bigger than that in more than one go has the
> potential of a lot of waste in retries (hence BW & time).
>
> I know, it's a spurious reason since downloads in progress could be saved
> somewhere else until completion... but still is a reason for now.
>
They are good reasons why we shouldn't implement download-resuming.
